Is it fair to say that ignorance makes me barking mad? Am I allowed to express my mind when I say I hate those who speak assertively on a subject when in reality they are not so absolutely certain about the legitimacy of their claims? This really is the determining factor that shapes my personality in terms of verbal fighting. I detest superfluity, fluff, artificiality, and people talking for the sake of talking and feeling the gratification in having the final say. This is the reason why I choose not to raise my opinion unless I know what I am about to say has substance. What is the purpose of it all? Why must arguments be so minutely dissected so that the initial intent, the point, is lost amidst all the pent up emotion and frustration? And to think that these are the very people who believe they are speaking from objectivity devoid of becoming subject to being sentimental when their very motivation to argue is a conspicuous denial of feeling. I, for one, refuse to accept squabbling without merit. That's right. What may mean the world to you has just been reduced to the status of mere blahblahblah's especially when the validity of your claims are questionable or insufficiently supported.
Words are meaningless without truth.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I like.
ReplyDelete